Comments on: 10 Best Lightweight Browsers for PC [Tested for RAM Usage] https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/ Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helped 500MM+ PC users. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:34:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.1 By: Claudiu Andone https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-109656 Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:34:58 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-109656 In reply to answer me.

Yes, of course! It’s one of the solutions on our list.

]]>
By: answer me https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-108756 Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:13:33 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-108756 can i use brave for my low end pc

]]>
By: V https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-61826 Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:31:21 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-61826 i think you shoud also add microsoft edge chromium, it also uses less CPU and memory

]]>
By: . https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-37096 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:24:51 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-37096 im pretty sure vivaldi isnt lightweight it is fast but the startup isnt and im pretty sure it literally takes a lot of resources

]]>
By: Monty https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-36930 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:00:24 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-36930 Complete garbage. Opera, Maxthon, Vivaldi, Brave – they are not lightweight at all.
Didn’t try others.
The only actually lightweight browser I know is MX Nitro, but it is based on the very old Chrome 35 engine.

]]>
By: modeforjoe https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-29123 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:24:00 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-29123 Too little information re each browser’s resource usage. This is more like a sales pitch, not a benefit to consumers.

]]>
By: rodocop https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-28499 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 21:44:00 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-28499 No really lightweight browser listed except unusable Lynx.

But wait! Is there no one subj around? Really?

Well, I should write it instead you, author.

1) K-Meleon – the most powerful, mature and configurable as well as really lightweightest modern browser. Gecko-based made using native Windows GUI-toolkit (MFC) – uses about 2-3 times less RAM than Chromiums and Foxes.

Super adjustable for user preferences and tastes. Work on XP and on SSE2-incapable CPUs.

2) TheWorld Browser 7 – the most lightweight chromium without extensions system and all that spying stuff. Still 1,5 time heavier than K-Meleon and without any fine tuning but more compatibility with some modern websites.

3) Otter Browser – a try to recreate old Opera on QTWebkit engine. Not fully functional yet, but comparable with K-Meleon in RAM consumption and with some GUI advantages.

]]>
By: David Mah https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-27549 Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:23:00 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-27549 was searching for a reliable review on lightweight browser as an alternative to chrome and firefox due to high usage of memory.. my initial impression was that your review could be reliable until you included comodo.. comodo is tainted as they adopted shady practices including disabling web security instead of making it more secure (as one would assumed since they are “security expert’).. os much for reliability of the above review

]]>
By: danket https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-25507 Mon, 15 May 2017 15:19:00 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-25507 In reply to BS Vijay Anand.

And Maxthon, spying on users 24/7, calling home in China sending everything, including list of installed software. Obviously this article was written by copy-paste specialist.

]]>
By: BS Vijay Anand https://windowsreport.com/lightweight-browser-windows/#comment-25425 Wed, 10 May 2017 05:44:00 +0000 https://windowsreport.com/?p=57060#comment-25425 Torch and lightweight? Is this article writer gone mad or what?

]]>